Menu
Interior Design Point
  • Curation Policy
  • Privacy Policy
Interior Design Point
Radon in My Apartment? The Spectra Pipeline

Radon in My Apartment? The Spectra Pipeline

Posted on November 26, 2019


An explosion in the West Village? Radon in my apartment? The Spectra pipeline is a high-pressure gas pipeline.
It’s nearly three feet in diameter, and this pipeline will carry fracked gas
into New York homes and businesses. Fracking is an extreme method of gas extraction
which has been shown to pollute the water and air. In places where drilling has happened some homeowners have actually been able
to set their faucets on fire. The Spectra pipeline will carry this fracked gas and enter
Manhattan under the Hudson River Park at Gansevoort Street. The builder of the pipeline, Spectra Energy
has a dismal safety record. Spectra has paid tens of millions of
dollars in fines for safety violations including toxic chemical spills,
leaks and explosions. A pipeline of similar size and pressure blew up in San Bruno, California. The blast killed eight people
and burned down thirty-eight homes. Can you imagine this happening in the
in the West Village? The risk of an explosion
is just one of many concerns. The Spectra pipeline will carry
fracked gas from Marcellus shale. This rock formation also has the exceedingly
high concentrations of radon. Radon is the number one cause of
lung cancer in non-smokers. The Spectra pipeline could deliver gas to your home
with high levels of radon. Until now, our gas has come from distant sources
where radon levels are low. The Spectra pipeline was approved
against the will of the community. Five thousand comments
were filed against it. Construction is already under away
with completion slated for this fall. But we’re determined to stop it
before gas flows through it. Forward this video to friends and family. Call your city and state representatives now Tell them to prohibit any increase of radon
trade on in the gas that utilities supply. For more information
and ways to become involved, please visit Occupy the Pipeline dot com.

100 thoughts on “Radon in My Apartment? The Spectra Pipeline”

  1. ProHumanity says:
    May 6, 2013 at 8:12 pm

    BOOO ON MISINFORMATION AND FEAR MONGERING – Scientific American just debunked this video… google search for: "Scientific American Fear mongering fracking"

    Reply
  2. T2LC says:
    May 7, 2013 at 1:10 am

    chances are any efforts against a corporation will end in failure. go team obama.

    Reply
  3. Jack Marquardt says:
    May 7, 2013 at 4:42 am

    please hire a stylist…

    Reply
  4. M.A. Lebron says:
    May 7, 2013 at 5:17 pm

    sure.

    Reply
  5. Rob Drinks Milk says:
    May 7, 2013 at 7:41 pm

    This will not happen. Gas groups interests and pockets are too big. Bigger and more powerful than anything you have ever encountered in your life. It will take the individual taking steps towards going green before larger corporations with more pull will take notice. Move out of the city, use public transportation or ride a bike. Invest in solar and rain catching technologies. 90% of those in this video are unwilling to do just that, because they indulge in the guilty pleasures of city living.

    Reply
  6. Rob Drinks Milk says:
    May 7, 2013 at 7:42 pm

    Maybe you should. lol.

    Reply
  7. Rob Drinks Milk says:
    May 7, 2013 at 7:45 pm

    The EPA has separate interests. Fracking companies have lobbied politicians into allowing them to drill and pump chemicals into the grounds. Tom Corbett of PA was one of the biggest advocates of fracking in PA. He's received 100's of thousands of dollars from gas and oil companies that have direct interests with Marcellus shale fracking.

    Reply
  8. oscar pereyra says:
    May 8, 2013 at 12:21 pm

    Not in our houses. Maybe at the power plants. And the only reason we use ancient technology to generate energy is because of the influence the petroleum industries have on the government. Wind/Water+Turbines and generators = electricity/energy. Do some research before you talk.

    Reply
  9. The Scenario File says:
    May 8, 2013 at 3:20 pm

    Uhm I encourage you to go watch the movie Gasland

    Go learn something and stop being a mindless idiot.

    Reply
  10. IkarrusAR says:
    May 8, 2013 at 11:37 pm

    59 persons are from the gas company

    Reply
  11. Valentino G says:
    May 9, 2013 at 11:41 am

    Are you against fracking itself, may I ask?

    Or are you against fracking only because of its negative consequences?

    My point being: If best practices were implemented and industry safety-standards set which didn't allow the leakage of hydraulic fracturing fluid into the surrounding water system, would you be ok with it?

    Renewable energy is great, but we aren't there yet.

    Reply
  12. DuckNe5t says:
    May 9, 2013 at 4:26 pm

    What makes the current natural gas supply in nyc so much safer? The video didn't explain that at all. It just said "currently we get our gas from MUCH farther away".

    Reply
  13. Thanatocoenosis says:
    May 10, 2013 at 9:57 pm

    Geologists have safely used fracing as a method to increase permeability in bedrock for over 60 years. It's history is long and well tested. Don't let the scaremongers fool you. Too currently, there 3 "explosive, high pressure pipelines" under the city supplying your natural gas. You people are fools if you think hydrocarbons won't be utilized to their fullest.

    Though, I agree that we need to develop alternative energy resources: we are on the cusp of a peak- the oil is about gone!

    Reply
  14. QuanSai says:
    May 13, 2013 at 12:28 am

    Don't you guys pay around $5 grand a month in rent? Why are you complaining? I'm sure it's easy for you guys to move just about anywhere without a problem. Right now, it's a matter of you guys being picky about your circumstances. You're lucky to have homes in the West Village. Try living in the South Bronx, where gas in our water system is the least of our worries. With all due respect, I don't give a crap about this. I have to worry about getting shot on my way to school.

    Reply
  15. jnmunsey says:
    May 17, 2013 at 6:07 am

    In all days and ages profitability has been most important, and it is due to profitability that we live in the modern society we're in today. Without it we'd still be living in the stone ages, though I guess we wouldn't have any man-caused environmental concerns…

    Reply
  16. kgoutube says:
    May 17, 2013 at 4:05 pm

    dwangelo: NY City methane gas radon levels currently are around 1 pico Curie per Liter having decayed from avg. of around 5 when gas left Gulf on 6~10 day trip. Radon in gas for Spectra comes from PA Marcellus where wellhead averages are far higher (36.9 ~ 2,576 pCi/L) and have far less time to decay. Result will be levels in the kitchens and neighborhoods potentially dozens of times higher than today and far higher than anyone really ought to ignore. (Radon forum at Cooper Union May 14.)

    Reply
  17. kgoutube says:
    May 17, 2013 at 4:07 pm

    This may be helpful to the thread:
    nirs.org/radiation/radonmarcellus.pdf
    Radon in Natural Gas from Marcellus Shale
    By Marvin Resnikoff, Radioactive Waste Management Associates
    Executive Summary

    Reply
  18. kgoutube says:
    May 17, 2013 at 4:20 pm

    Guilty pleasures? Where is your mind wandering? City living is highly efficient from an energy standpoint, RobDrinksMilk, and where is public transportation more readily available?

    Reply
  19. kgoutube says:
    May 17, 2013 at 4:26 pm

    NYC methane source today is Gulf of Mexico. Radon level there is around 5 pCi/L and this decays to around 1 after the 6-10 day pipeline trip to NYC. PA Marcellus Shale formation gas ranges from 36.9 to 2,576 pCi/L at wellhead and will have very little travel time to decay. Search and read this document for references: radonmarcellus.pdf

    Reply
  20. E Jabez says:
    May 23, 2013 at 10:18 pm

    The problems facing "alternate energy" are fundamental, deep, and are show-stoppers.

    Reply
  21. N30PH0BIA says:
    May 24, 2013 at 10:16 pm

    Centipedes? In MY vagina?

    Reply
  22. tstuff says:
    May 31, 2013 at 5:42 pm

    Like what?
    Tell that to countries like Germany, Iceland, Norway, Spain, France and even China. Most countries are moving that way. Only knuckle draggers in the US continue to deny that green energies will ever work and they are fighting to keep the sane people in the same state of stupid they remain in.

    Reply
  23. tstuff says:
    May 31, 2013 at 5:44 pm

    Sometime Robdrinkskoolaid. You just can't fix stupid.

    Reply
  24. redball81 says:
    June 3, 2013 at 4:12 am

    Also, radon is a carcinogen–which I interpret as: any non-zero level of exposure is UNSAFE. It's callous of this Sarah to downplay the real and dangerous effects of this poison.

    Reply
  25. KarmaTiger says:
    June 8, 2013 at 3:24 pm

    Methane isn't dangerous at all? You do know it's explosive, right? that's why in very small amounts (see: farts) people can light it on fire. It also displaces oxygen and can asphyxiate you, as happens to farmers working around open sewage pits and can happen in other places like small apartments as Owen mentioned are prevalent in New York.

    Reply
  26. WalterX123 says:
    July 12, 2013 at 3:43 am

    I agree Tim- this video actually weakens the argument, mixing in exceptionally rare dangers and omitting key facts- good if only the uninformed watch it (since that's who made it). I have 25+ years professionally drilling (and fracking) natural gas & oil wells. I'm no fan of the industry (for other reasons) but most of the time I come across people pushing for a cause, collecting signatures, giving warnings… it's all for the wrong reasons as it relates to gas, fracking, and the environment.

    Reply
  27. mkobilas says:
    July 23, 2013 at 2:11 pm

    Start a petition on the white house's petition page

    Reply
  28. Music Man says:
    July 23, 2013 at 9:27 pm

    Lol.. "fare". Stopped reading there

    Reply
  29. Hugo Marq says:
    July 24, 2013 at 12:41 am

    NYC resident here and i don't buy your fear tactic. I'm all for clean renewable sources but you obviously have an agenda you are campaigning for and its not to warn people how their beautiful houses will suddenly combust. Those poor poor people. gimme a break.

    Reply
  30. Ka'lika T. Fria'niquia says:
    July 24, 2013 at 7:29 am

    anti-pipeline new yorkers can go take a poop inside their own butts.

    Reply
  31. Pete Raw says:
    July 24, 2013 at 9:22 pm

    down with the pipe lines!

    Reply
  32. john agurubatto says:
    July 25, 2013 at 1:24 am

    and ZariNation please don't twist people's words around especially when you know what they mean and they mean well.

    Reply
  33. Joe Lipari says:
    July 25, 2013 at 1:11 pm

    I'd care more if they found engaging people to put in the video…

    Reply
  34. NMBandit819 says:
    July 25, 2013 at 5:10 pm

    This pipeline really isn't that bad for New York. The EPA, the Department of Energy and another third party have all said that there is no health risk related to radon gas. Also, the gas line in California that blew up was built in 1956 and was poorly maintained. This gas line will actually be one of the safest in the country.
    This is just a scare tactic made by stupid people who like to complain and feel important.

    Reply
  35. matuke3 says:
    July 26, 2013 at 12:39 am

    Derp… because you actually know what Radon is and is perusing a career in Chemistry Unlike others. Radon will cause cancer , you should do your research and know that these companies care not about the people who purchase their product but only the money they find profitable

    Reply
  36. NMBandit819 says:
    July 26, 2013 at 1:33 am

    First of all your grammar is atrocious, to the point that your comment is nearly illegible. Second, I am not disputing the danger of radon. I am disputing the danger of radon in this pipeline. As I said in my previous comment, the EPA, Department of Energy and an independent company have all certified that there will be minimal radon in the pipeline and it will not pose any health risk.

    Reply
  37. 94 Crates says:
    July 26, 2013 at 3:50 am

    Is this real or some Kony type propaganda

    Reply
  38. Uncommon Neutrality says:
    July 26, 2013 at 3:55 pm

    That is not a good idea for about a billion other safety reasons, radon or no. Go to the landlord with a heat complaint and he/she will likely hop to compliance to avoid the city getting involved. If they don't hop to get a ceramic heater and you can get reimbursed for the extra electricity.

    Reply
  39. Kat Moon says:
    July 26, 2013 at 6:39 pm

    Wow!

    Reply
  40. livingstonem10 says:
    July 27, 2013 at 12:05 am

    Introducing a pitch-black approach
    Taste the horns of the future
    Swallow the sulfur of the new order
    To resist is to non-exist

    Reply
  41. jlfonz says:
    July 27, 2013 at 4:49 pm

    This is almost as good as a Joh Stewart segment…

    Reply
  42. Lance Abbott says:
    July 27, 2013 at 10:06 pm

    Do any of you even investigate anything before commenting. This entire video is misinformed garbage. Go look into any of the peer reviewed, scientific studies dealing with "fracking", none of the shit they contend in this video is true. Pseudoscientific nonsense, @ best.

    Reply
  43. bbosch says:
    August 3, 2013 at 9:15 pm

    In you can't tell the difference between a Kony type campaign and this, you're a fool.
    You just have to look into who's benefiting from campaigns like this to understand if it's corporate propaganda or genuine activism. This seems to be genuine since it is brushing against what a the powerful want.

    Reply
  44. Ashief K says:
    August 6, 2013 at 9:54 pm

    LMFAO "5000 Comments have been filed" Nice try

    Reply
  45. Alex Yenni says:
    August 9, 2013 at 3:48 pm

    The only reason this is an issue is that it's coming in through the west village. 80% of all natural gas comes from hydraulic fracturing, and if people still want their stoves to work then it has to come onto Manhattan from somewhere. You wouldn't be hearing about this if they routed it through Harlem.

    Reply
  46. Tokkemon says:
    August 23, 2013 at 11:27 pm

    "Radon laced". Pardon me while I laugh. Do you actually know what Radon is? It's hardly harmful.

    Reply
  47. orangemyk says:
    September 22, 2013 at 1:35 pm

    So many hipsters

    Reply
  48. Quinn Swain-Nisbet says:
    September 22, 2013 at 1:35 pm

    Yet they provide evidence, evidence that shows outcome of something like this.

    Reply
  49. Quinn Swain-Nisbet says:
    September 22, 2013 at 1:48 pm

    Famous last words, also unlikely to listen to someone who insults others, call it a pet peeve.

    Reply
  50. Timex Lordx says:
    September 22, 2013 at 1:49 pm

    I'm sorry the moment someone says Libtards I assume they are a 4 year old child. I mean do you conservatives think you are clever? On the point you made I agree but grow the hell up. Jesus you are all the joke of America because of this bullshit. Stop making stupid puns and stupid fucking jokes and grow up.

    Reply
  51. phattvids says:
    September 22, 2013 at 1:56 pm

    I knew that had to be a lyric. Not a bad song.

    Reply
  52. retromex55 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 3:58 pm

    They probably already reside over high pressure distribution natural gas lines. What a crock. Oh well, let them freeze…they are building a new pipeline to NYC because the demand for heating homes can't be kept up with.

    Reply
  53. retromex55 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 3:59 pm

    NYC already gets gas from the Marcellus and any naturally occurring radon or radium decay products in the Marcellus gas comes off in the propane fraction that is not sold for heating homes (which is 97% methane). Radon has a half life of a few days and decays into products that can be removed by filters anyway…filters which are used every 30-60 miles on the pipeline at compressor stations used to push the gas forward. Sigh. There are so many things wrong with this video.

    Reply
  54. circusboy90210 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 4:20 pm

    methane is very safe and clean . it's alot better than coal and needs no huge trucks lumbering through the streets.

    Reply
  55. circusboy90210 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 4:21 pm

    fearmongeig at it's worst. probably this fear-mongering is being pushed by other heating sources.

    Reply
  56. circusboy90210 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 4:25 pm

    0:26 has been shown to pollute water and air. true but not the complete truth , this is only in a very very small fraction of the tens of millions of fracking wells that have been drilled in the last 50 years. that's right fracking is not new. only the gas layers are thousands of feet away from water sources. do your own research and learn the whole truth. not the lies being told here. the usa has 100,000 times more methane than saudi arabia has in oil energy units.

    Reply
  57. circusboy90210 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 4:28 pm

    0:42 dismal safety record??? 17 violations out of how many thousands of projects and how many years??this does not tell the entire story and we have no way to know the severity of the violations. so to say 17 violations is alot is a lie.

    Reply
  58. circusboy90210 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 4:32 pm

    5,000 comments out of how many of the probablyl hundreds of thousands of people that live in that area. see how not telling the whole story paints an incomplete picture that makes it appear that people don't want this, or that it is a bad thing?

    Reply
  59. zaklange says:
    September 22, 2013 at 6:14 pm

    that's what i'm thinking

    Reply
  60. CarpeMetus says:
    September 22, 2013 at 6:23 pm

    That's propaganda at it's finest. They only have to tell their side of the story. The better to incite an emotional response, instead of civil discourse.

    Reply
  61. havoc1482 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 7:29 pm

    What fucking evidence? 17 incidents? Out of what? thousands of projects/jobs? Radon has a half-life 3.8 days which then it is just easily removed by filters that are in the compressor stations. All this video show is upset green-piece idiots that don't do any research. This video is trying to elicit an emotional response without and real hard evidence. This is biased and useless.

    Reply
  62. Corinne Powers says:
    September 22, 2013 at 9:37 pm

    That is technically not a lie, just unclear. A lie is presenting false information knowingly. 17 is just a number. They chose to add "a lot" but that is obviously just their opinion on if that number is high or not. Just because you disagree with their opinion on what a "lot" is that does not make them a liar.

    (I am not agreeing or disagreeing with either you or the video I just hate people being stupid and like to correct mind numbing mistakes when I see them. Ignore me if you want!)

    Reply
  63. Corinne Powers says:
    September 22, 2013 at 9:40 pm

    Also I would point out, ANY violations are a lot. Violations are, guess what, NOT supposed to happen. That is called "competence" perhaps you have heard about it? Businesses, like people, are supposed to follow the laws. "Violations" are literally "violations of the law" so severity is a non-issue. Who cares how severe it is? We don't judge law like that for determining guilt (only punishment). Don't be a violator. Defending violators for making violations makes you look like one. (Just saying.)

    Reply
  64. retromex55 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 10:17 pm

    exactly what I said about the radon! 17 isn't bad at all…especially for a large company like Spectra and we don't even hear if they are serious/non lol

    Reply
  65. retromex55 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 10:19 pm

    Yea but some violations are less serious than others…it could be for having a muddy walkway or one too many steps without a handrail…versus any number of very serious offenses that could be an immediate hazard to life and limb. OSHA could literally walk into ANY business and find dozens of violations if they wanted to.

    Reply
  66. retromex55 says:
    September 22, 2013 at 10:20 pm

    So yea, severity does matter. Non-serious violations won't kill anyone…

    Reply
  67. Corinne Powers says:
    September 23, 2013 at 12:16 am

    YES that is fine. Okay. But "17 violations" is in and of itself not a lie. YOU are arguing that OUR ignorance of the severity somehow means that they couldn't have been severe? I argue that OUR ignorance of the severity means we can't fucking know, can we? What if all 17 violations resulted in a worker's death? Would you still be defending them? Point is, no one here KNOWS what those violations are so you CANNOT deny the EXACT OPPOSITE of your argument being equally as possible. (Pointless.)

    Reply
  68. retromex55 says:
    September 23, 2013 at 1:20 am

    I wasn't arguing either way. They could be serious they could be nothing. It's public record anyway…they say 2011…we could go to OSHA's Establishment Search Page and search citations under "Spectra Energy" from 1/1/11-12/31/11 easy enough haha…as a matter of fact, I just did…and found only four…all for construction, and yes…serious (trenching and excavations). The rest are probably Spectra contractors and they lumped them in there to make their number sound better.

    Reply
  69. OriginalPotatotube says:
    September 23, 2013 at 1:22 am

    I hope the price in rent drops in nyc and all the hipsters move out if this gets through.

    Reply
  70. June191951 says:
    September 23, 2013 at 4:05 am

    so bogus.

    Reply
  71. kitteyandkat says:
    September 23, 2013 at 8:03 am

    Don't fuck with New York water man! How else are we going to make the best pizza and bagels?!? =/

    Reply
  72. ogabogapat says:
    September 24, 2013 at 9:19 am

    Very sensationalist, please provide sources and actual amounts. Thanks

    Reply
  73. It's Time says:
    September 24, 2013 at 6:53 pm

    Oh my God, this video is A COMPLETE LIE. As usual the radical enviro nuts use the fire from a water faucet to push their agenda. Of course, that town has had that issue for decades PRIOR to fracking.

    Reply
  74. It's Time says:
    September 24, 2013 at 6:59 pm

    Of course, they offer no proof. Just ridiculous nonsensical BS. None backed up by facts. In fact, so much of this is debunked lunacy it's almost comical.

    Reply
  75. UglyStru says:
    September 25, 2013 at 3:21 am

    This is the biggest cry for attention I've seen since Kony 2012. More than half of the things these people say are pure lies. Yes, the Spectra pipeline exists and does transport gas to New York City, but it isn't even close to being as dangerous as these people make it. These people are the ones you see at cafes downtown asking to see a Vegan-only menu.

    Reply
  76. dickcaveat says:
    September 25, 2013 at 3:24 pm

    I believe the word you're looking for is UNinhabitable.

    Reply
  77. knicks1616 says:
    September 25, 2013 at 8:45 pm

    all these liberals are pathetic

    Reply
  78. SpringRockerPSN says:
    September 26, 2013 at 8:17 am

    After doing my research I found only 14 violations from 2006 to 2012 (pipeline related). So maybe you should stop being ignorant, or you can put me in my place by citing a list of OSHA reports that make up the "17 violations" in 2011.

    I'm just saying back your stuff up with facts, not angry rants that can't stand on their own. It's the only way you're going to argue against the facts.

    Btw retromex55 is right, and it's all done as a preventive measure to save lives.

    Reply
  79. Quinn Swain-Nisbet says:
    September 26, 2013 at 9:56 pm

    The evidence that shows Fracking results are never desirable, but glad to know the intelligence and eloquence of person I am talking too.

    Reply
  80. Owen Crowley says:
    September 26, 2013 at 10:11 pm

    Yes, I agree with the evidence-based reasoning, thank you. Also, regarding the radon — NYC is less than 12 hours away from some of the Marcellus frack fields, which is much less than the 3.8 day half life of radon. As for the the supposed filters in compressor stations, I'd like to know more about that. While you can filter some of radon's daughter products, radon itself is a nobel gas. I have never heard of filters that actually filter radon. So NYC residents are indeed exposed to a risk.

    Reply
  81. Anthony Macchia says:
    September 27, 2013 at 12:16 pm

    This is absolutely insufferable. Even if you can manage to get past the boring ass monotonous voices and horribly dressed actors, you're still left with a misguided, overly-ambitious, and overly-pessimistic argument. I really want to see these so called "17 violations in 2011". There have only been 14 from 2006-2012. Maybe if you weren't stating so many things out of context it'd make more sense. You're the kind of people who are so eager to use your "freedom of speech" that you cant stfu.

    Reply
  82. Kenneth Ejerta says:
    September 30, 2013 at 1:30 am

    Uhh not neccessairly, if you looked at scientific peer reviewed articles on hydraulic fracturing there is A LOT of evidence stating the implications of contamination of ground water as well as affecting the environment negatively.

    Source:
    PubMed

    Reply
  83. Avorkhan says:
    October 9, 2013 at 4:43 am

    You're definetely right

    Reply
  84. TheGooseof2006 says:
    October 20, 2013 at 3:02 am

    I don't like bad things happening where I live.

    Reply
  85. TheGooseof2006 says:
    October 20, 2013 at 3:02 am

    I don't like bad things happening where I live.

    Reply
  86. AvangionQ says:
    October 21, 2013 at 6:16 am

    When some new clusters of lung cancer pop up in Manhattan, we'll know who to blame.

    Reply
  87. shcgrunt says:
    October 24, 2013 at 12:51 am

    I want you to answer me this question. Are the people going against this video are right? Or are the people in the video and the people that agrees with the video are right? I really wanna know about this guys, because we are less than a week away to this pipeline is complete and I don't want to be the one or anybody living in NYC suffering from lung cancer from weeks to month's after this is completed.

    Reply
  88. bokdol says:
    October 25, 2013 at 6:00 pm

    so your telling them the only way to get nat gas is to risk blowing up. wow that is stupid. uh there are other ways of getting gas. did you even pay attention to the video. this company fucked up people's lives and homes and this is your attitude toward it. how about we make multi million dollar companies pay heavily for the violation or better how about re have stronger regulation so people can have a safe environment. oh but your probably against safety.

    Reply
  89. bokdol says:
    October 25, 2013 at 6:07 pm

    one thing in the research that is not pointed out, is one violation and carry multiple faults. the violation for corrosion counts as one violation even though it is in different locations.

    Reply
  90. moorepower310 says:
    November 2, 2013 at 1:13 am

    Once you see the girl at 1:11 you will see what kind of morons these people are.

    Reply
  91. Steve Packard says:
    November 4, 2013 at 7:50 pm

    How do you propose transporting a flamable gas from one location to another with zero risk of explosion? Yes, pipelines explode. Not very often, but it happens. Airplanes crash too. Also, not very often.

    The thing about gas pipelines is that newer ones are a lot safer than older ones and the one in San Bruno was built in 1956. If you think relying on New York's existing, old pipelines is safer, you are dead wrong.

    Reply
  92. Steve Packard says:
    November 5, 2013 at 1:41 am

    Natural gas has radon in it. This is true of pretty much all natural gas. Whether this gas has more is pretty insignificant. The amount is tiny. It's a lot less than if you live in a house with a dirt floored basement.

    If super concerned about it, you can cook with electric.

    I would not be concerned, really. It raises your risk by such a tiny amount it's not worth worrying about. The stress might give you a heart attack though.

    Reply
  93. Steve Packard says:
    November 5, 2013 at 1:42 am

    Um… that's how natural gas is produced. If you don't like it, start heating with coal, which, I assure you, is much much worse.

    Reply
  94. Brendan Donovan says:
    November 7, 2013 at 9:53 pm

    Why did they tell us how many safety violations instead of just saying BOTH how many TOTAL as wall as how many failures?

    Reply
  95. Dale S says:
    November 8, 2013 at 2:41 pm

    :24 is a perfect example of how they are trying to state two facts together to create meaning, even where there is none.

    "In places where drilling has happened, some homeowners have even been able to set their faucets on fire."

    Notice that they don't say that it's because of fracing, rather that it's just taking place near it. They don't mention that this happens to water wells any time there are deposits of natural gas near it, whether fracing is being performed nearby or not. This "problem" is as old as piped water wells.

    Reply
  96. youtux2 says:
    December 15, 2013 at 5:48 pm

    This video certainly pleased Spectra's board of directors.

    Reply
  97. Novos Timoneiros says:
    January 6, 2014 at 12:35 am

    Thank you!

    Reply
  98. Jc of house Baratheon kush on deck says:
    September 23, 2014 at 9:28 pm

    wow this is crazy this powerful ritch ppl obviously dont care  we should all get together and revolution go to war to protect our water, inviroment our ppl

    Reply
  99. Maximus Minimus says:
    November 6, 2016 at 12:55 am

    These people are hysterical idiots.

    Reply
  100. heinrichvon says:
    April 8, 2019 at 2:19 pm

    Occupy the Pipeline lost that battle. But we will win the war.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • What House Would You Pick? $250,000 Home VS $550,000 Home | Comparing House Value
  • Local home remodeling firm designing greener buildings
  • Boris Destroys The Living Room and Gets Grounded
  • Ashley Cleveland | Cornerstone’s Living Room Concert Series
  • How to Clean a Microwave: Cleaning Household Appliances
  • Vinegar Dishsoap Household Spray Cleaner
  • Accused drug dealer attempt to take over Roselawn apartment ends in SWAT call, 2 arrests
  • Robert Ray reacts to the House Judiciary impeachment hearing
  • House Impeachment Inquiry Hearing – Feldman, Karlan, Gerhardt & Turley Testimony
  • Boardwalk Villas 2 Bedroom (Boardwalk Villas Studio + Boardwalk 1 Bedroom) Preferred View / Vlog 3

Recent Comments

  • Fur Ball on House Impeachment Inquiry Hearing – Feldman, Karlan, Gerhardt & Turley Testimony
  • Christopher Steinhauer on House Impeachment Inquiry Hearing – Feldman, Karlan, Gerhardt & Turley Testimony
  • Clinton Sarver on House Impeachment Inquiry Hearing – Feldman, Karlan, Gerhardt & Turley Testimony
  • Conan 2020 on House Impeachment Inquiry Hearing – Feldman, Karlan, Gerhardt & Turley Testimony
  • Granny of Many on House Impeachment Inquiry Hearing – Feldman, Karlan, Gerhardt & Turley Testimony

Tags

and architecture art craft crafts decor decorating decoration design DIY DIY projects diy room decor do it yourself for furniture home home decor home design home improvement home tour house house tour how to ideas interior interior decorating interior design kitchen living room modern new News real estate renovation Repair room decor small house that the This Tiny House tips tutorial video You
©2019 Interior Design Point | WordPress Theme by Superbthemes.com